Home History Data Pictures Damages
SPRING CREEK WATERSHED
CHARACTERISTICS DATA
Runoff Management Features and USGS Indirect Discharge Sites
Hydrography- Streams, Perennial Lakes and Canals
Composite Land-Surface Hydrology
USGS- Spring Creek Channel Cross-Sections (Courtesy of USGS)
HEC-2 (HEC-RAS) Input Deck for Spring Creek
SWMM Model Input Deck (not yet available)
The geospatially-referenced data available for downloading on this page are stored in UTM coordinates, Zone 16, using the Clark 1866 reference geoid. These maps were written using the GRASS Geographic Information System (GIS). The format of ASCII GRASS maps is explained here.
The following image was scanned from a map of damaged areas developed by the City of Fort Collins, Geographic Information Systems Department. The Spring Creek Watershed boundary is drawn approximately to illustrate the region considered. The legend shows the type of damages incurred within the watershed during the flood. This image also details the location of the detention pond that was designed to attenuate the 1% probability storm.
CLICK TO ENLARGE (250 kb)
The figure below shows some of the salient features of
the watershed, including lateral canals that cross Spring Creek, details
of the large detention basin, and points were the Colorado District
of the USGS performed indirect discharge estimates (in grey, numbered rectangles).
CLICK TO ENLARGE (109 kb)
We first went to the US Geological Survey to obtain a digital elevation model (DEM) of the Spring Creek watershed. We discovered to our delight that the data for the Spring Creek watershed are available 30m horizontal resolution. These data were contained on two USGS quadrangles, namely the Fort Collins and Horsetooth quads. We ordered the data and anxiously awaited its arrival.
Upon arrival, we used the public-domain GRASS Geographic Information System (GIS) to merge these two quadrangles into a seamless DEM of the watershed. After completing this straightforward step, we displayed the resultant digital elevation model and saw the following (with the Spring Creek boundary vector overlaid):

In the above image, the elevation of the DEM elevation increases from yellow to cyan. If you look carefully at this image, you will notice two things. First, this is a very noisy DEM. Notice the spotty nature of the elevations. Secondly, you will notice a vertical line in the lower left-hand corner of the DEM. This line corresponds to the location of the boundary between the Fort Collins (eastern) and Horsetooth (western) quads. The line only appears in the lower (southern) portion of this image, but this is an artifact of the color map used in the image. To further examine the difference, the same DEM is displayed below using a different color scale.

As you can see in the above two images, this abrupt change in elevation extends alont the entire boundary between the Fort Collins and Horsetooth 30m DEM quadrangles. The magnitude of the error across the boundary of the two quadrangles varies between 2 and 15 m (6.6 and 49.2 ft). This error is unacceptable for detailed hydrologic analysis, so we went back to square 1.
In the end, we decided to construct our own digital elevation model. We found that the elevation contours on the Fort Collins and Horsetooth paper quadrangles lined up quite well at their common boundary. Creation of our own DEM was a two-step process. First, we digitized the contours from both maps. Second, we used the GRASS s.surf.tps algorithm to generate a continuous surface. The resulting digital elevation model is shown in the figure below, with the original vector contours overlaid on the surface. The contour interval is 10 ft (3.04m).

DOWNLOAD
Shift-click here to download this map.
This map is a floating-point ASCII GRASS GIS map, with elevation in meters.
The format of ASCII GRASS maps is defined here.
Soils data were obtained from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS- formerly SCS) county soil survey for Larimer County, Colorado. The distinct soil classes were digitized, and converted from vectors into a 30 m raster map using GRASS. This map was reclassified into Rawls and Brakensiek (1983) soil textural classifications:

The soil textural classifications corresponding to the
above map are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The image below shows digitized land-use/land-cover (LULC) vectors overlaid on the final digital elevation model of the Spring Creek Watershed. Each of the polygons in the LULC data layer has distinct attributes. These attributes were obtained from the GIS Department in the City of Fort Collins.

The LULC attributes were assigned to the 30 m raster elements within the watershed boundary. The resulting raster map appears in the following figure.

Notice the one-to-one correspondence of the above colored regions in the raster map (bottom) to the vector map (top). Each of the colors in the raster map correspond to a distinctive LULC classification. For instance, pasture appears as blue, perrenial lakes are pink, suburban LULC is orange, etc.
DOWNLOAD
Shift-click here to
download this integer GRASS ASCII map. The format of ASCII
GRASS maps is defined here.
The following image shows vector hydrographic data (blue) and the vector Spring Creek watershed boundary (black). Spring Creek runs from the southwest corner of the watershed, towards the east-northeast. There are numerous small irrigation canals crossing the watershed from north-northwest to south-southeast. The capacity of these irrigation canals is quite small because of their small cross-section and slope. Therefore, their impact on the flooding was minor.

A number of factors affect the hydrologic behavior of the land surface. The three dominant factors are the land-use, land-cover, and soil texture. The map below shows a composite soil saturated hydraulic conductivity map.

The following saturated hydraulic conductivity values
were assigned to the categories shown in the above map:
| Color | Description | Percent Coverage | Sat. Hydr. Conductivity (cm/h) |
| yellow | impervious areas | 23 | 0.0 |
| green | Clay loam | 21 | 0.20 |
| cyan | Silt loam | 3 | 0.34 |
| blue | Loam | 42 | 0.6 |
| red | Sandy Loam | 11 | 1.0 |
DOWNLOAD
Shift-click here to download this map.
This map is a floating-point ASCII GRASS GIS map. The format of ASCII
GRASS maps is defined here.
The following Microsoft Excel (8.0) files contain detailed cross-section surveys at 10 points that had a significant effect or established control on the flood discharges. Not all of the cross-sections are in Spring Creek.
DOWNLOAD
Shift-click to download each file you want.
Fairbrooke. Channel
(Spring Creek watershed)
Clearview
Channel Clearview channel downstream
from Taft Hill Road (CSU Campus watershed)
Dorset Drive
(Spring Creek watershed)
Fossil Creek
at S. Lemay Avenue (Fossil Creek watershed)
Hill
Pond Subdivision Spring Creek downstream from
Shields Street
Plum.xls
Plum channel upstream from Taft Hill Road
Riverside Ave.
Spring Creek at Union Pacific RR Bridge (downstream indirect discharge
site)
Railroad
Embankment Spring Creek detention pond was formed by this railroad
embankment, near College Ave.
Shields St.
Spring Creek main channel just downstream from Shields Street.
Wallenburg
Drive Spring
Creek downstream from Shields Street.
Springm.dat Shift-click to download.
Data Links
CSU Radar data http://olympic.atmos.colostate.edu/
Doppler http://www.hmsweather.com/doppler.htmAtmospheric CSU http://olympic.atmos.colostate.edu/flood97.html